Eurabia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with Eurybia.
| Part of a series on |
| Islamophobia |
|---|
 |
Eurabia is a political neologism.[2] The concept was coined by Bat Ye'Or in the early 2000s. Bat Ye'Or (pen name of Gisele Littman)claims a conspiracy of Europe, allegedly led by France and Arab powers, to Islamise and Arabise Europe, thereby weakening its existing culture and undermining an alleged previous alignment with the U.S. and Israel.[3][4]
The term has gained some public interest and has been used and discussed across a wide range of the political spectrum, including far-right activists,[5] counterjihadis and different sorts of antiislamist and conservative activists. Bat Ye'Or’s “Mother conspiracy theory” has been used for further subtheories.[6] The narrative grew important in expressing Islamophobic sentiments and was used by movements like Stop Islamisation of Europe. It gained renewed interest after the 9/11 events and due to the use of the term by2011 Norway attacker Anders Behring Breivik. It is as well a part of classical Anti-Europeanism, a strong influence in American culture and American exceptionalism[7] which sometimes sees Europe on the decline or as a rising rival power, or, as is the case here, both.
See also: List of Eurabia literature
Contents
[hide]Basic Narrative[edit]
In Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, Bat Ye'or claims that Eurabia is the result of the Euro-Arab Dialogue, based on an allegedly French-led European policy intended to increase European power against the United States by aligning its interests with those of the Arab countries. During the 1973 oil crisis, the European Economic Community (predecessor of the European Union), had entered into the Euro-Arab Dialogue (EAD) with the Arab League.[8] Ye'or claims it as a primary cause of alleged European hostility to Israel, referring to joint Euro-Arab foreign policies that she characterizes as anti-American and anti-Zionist.[9] Ye'or purported a close connection of a Eurabia conspiracy and used the term "dhimmitude", denoting alleged "western subjection to Islam".[10] The term itself is based on a newsletter published in the 1970s by the Comité européen de coordination des associations d'amitié avec le monde Arabe, a Euro-Arab friendship committee.[1][9]
Bat Ye'Or's Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis was the first print publication in the Eurabia genre,[10] which has since grown to a number of titles,[11][12] including Melanie Phillips'Londonistan,[13] Oriana Fallaci's The Force of Reason,[14] and Bruce Bawer's While Europe Slept.[15] The term is often used by the writers (Fallaci,[16][17] Steyn)[18][19][20] and several web sites, many of them affiliated with the counterjihad movement.[21] Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen's Defeating Eurabia[22] earned him a high standing among far-right extremists.[23]
An important part of the narrative is the idea of a demographic threat, the fear that, at some time in the future, Islam will take over Europe.[24] or as Bernard Lewis put it, "Europe will be Islamic by the end of the century."[25][26] Walter Laqueur's The Last Days of Europe [27] is quoted often among the Eurabia literature; however, he modified his statements later.
Impact[edit]
The slogan has become a basic theme in the European extremist and populist right and expresses as well a significnt strategy change. This has led to the adoption of political positions that were previously considered fringe or third rail on either side. The main anti-Islamic theme has also penetrated into mainstream European politics,[5] for instance in the case of Dutch populist Party for Freedom leader Geert Wilders:
Significant alterations in the asserted positions of the political (far) right include a sudden focus on the rights of women and homosexuals.[5][29][30] The conservative historian Nigel Ferguson referred to the concept, taken as the potential future Islamisation of Europe based on mere demographic facts and a supposed ideational lack of the continent.[31]
While immigrants are being deemed a threat, in the postwar 1940s period, the British extreme right – in particular Fascist politician Oswald Mosley– were rather outspoken (see the Union Movement and the Europe a Nation slogan) in favour of a stronger integration of Britain with Europe and, using their own interpretation of the Eurafrika concept, Africa.[32][33]
Shortcomings[edit]
Eurabia is not considered as actual science. Several academics have described the Eurabia concept as an Islamophobicconspiracy theory.[34] Eurabia shortcuts the complex interaction between the USA, France, Israel, the Arabic and Muslim countries on an "us against them" basis. The Eurabia theories are dismissed as Islamophobic, extremist[4][5] and conspiracy theories in the academic community.[34] At first academics showed little interest in the Eurabia theories due to their lack of factual basis.[6][35] The theme was treated in studies of rightist extremism[5] and Middle East Politics.[36] This changed after the 2011 Norway attacks, which resulted in the publication of several works specifically treating the Eurabia conspiracy theories.[10][37] Janne Haaland Matlary went as far as to say that "it is poor use of time to analyse something so primitive".[38]
Eurafrika[edit]
Main article: Eurafrika
A vision of a stronger cooperation of Europe and its African or mediterranean neighbours was neither new nor especially endangering. The elder concepts of 'Eurafrique' or 'Eurafrika', both portmanteaus of Europe and Afrika referred to the much elder idea of strategic partnership between Africa and Europe. Already in the 1920s Richard Nikolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder of the first popular movement for a united Europe, believed in a Eurafrika alliance using the European colonies as "dowry"[39] to allow Europa to compete against the Americas and Asia.[40][41] Largely forgotten in the present, in the 1920s Europe's future survival and continued role in history was seen in close connection with a successful merger with Africa.[42] As a genuine political project, it played a crucial role in the early development of the European Union.[43]
France was one of the staunchest supporters of Israel in the 1950s and shared till the 1960s a strategic interest, due to its Algerian territories, against radical Arab nationalism with its heyday in the Suez Crisis. The scientific literature sees the military and diplomatic blunders of the strongest European colonial powers, Great Britain and France, in theSuez crisis and with respect to France, the Battle of Dien Bien Phu and the start of the Algerian War, as markers of failed ambitions.[44] The Eurafrika narrative cuts that short and starts after the USA assumed its current role as ally of Israel with the Six-Day War in 1967 and France started taking sides with the Arab world to improve its relations after the independence of Algeria.[45]
The rather bleak Eurabia narrative lacks any positive vision of Europe. [46][47] It ignores as well differences within Europe (compare Olim L'Berlin) with regard to welcoming Jewish or Israeli immigrants. Actual Muslim elites in Europe have completely different, rather differentiated and overall much more positive impressions of Europe and are rather outspoken against religious fundamentalism.[48]
Demography[edit]
The Pew Research Center notes that "the data that we have isn't pointing in the direction of 'Eurabia' at all",[49] and predicts that the percentage of Muslims is estimated to rise to 8% in 2030. Most academics who have analysed the demographics dismiss the predictions that the EU will have Muslim majorities.[50] It is completely reasonable to assume that the overall Muslim population in Europe will increase, and Muslim citizens have and will have a significant imprint on European life.[51] The prospect of a homogenous Muslim community per se, or a Muslim majority in Europe is however out of the question.[52]
Justin Vaïsse seeks to discredit what he calls, "four myths of the alarmist school", using Muslims in France as an example. Specifically he has written that the Muslim population growth rate was lower than that predicted by Eurabia, partly because the fertility rate of immigrants declines with integration.[53] He further points out that Muslims are not a monolithic or cohesive group,[54] and that many Muslims do seek to integrate politically and socially. Finally, he wrote that despite their numbers, Muslims have had little influence on French foreign policy.[55]
Furthermore leading European Muslims are rather outspoken against religious fundamentalism and are far from acknowledging Arab countries as a role model at all.[48][56]
The Eurabia narrative ignores the current status of Christianity as a religion growing significantly in the global perspective. The Pentecostalism movement is being deemed the fastest-growing religion worldwide[57] and the current success of Christianity in China is being described as one of the "greatest revivals in Christian history".[58][59][relevant? ]
David Aaronovitch acknowledges that the threat of "jihadist terror" may be real, but that there is no threat of Eurabia. Aaronovitch concludes that those who study conspiracy theories will recognize Eurabia to be a theory that adds the "Sad Dupes thesis to the Enemy Within idea".[60]
Spread of conspiracies and further influences[edit]
The Economist rejected the concept of Eurabia as "scaremongering".[61] Simon Kuper in Financial Times described Ye'or's book as "little-read but influential", and akin to "Protocols of the Elders of Zion in reverse", adding that "though ludicrous, Eurabia became the spiritual mother of a genre".[12]
Examples of proponent's use:
- Geert Wilders (September 16, 2009). "Speech in the Dutch parliament". Geert Wilders' blog. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
- Bruce Thornton (March 26, 2005). "The Civilization of Dhimmitude - A review of Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, by Bat Ye'or". Victor Davis Hanson on the web. RetrievedJune 8, 2012.
- Bat Ye'Or (July 27, 2004). "How Europe Became Eurabia". FrontPage Magazine. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
- David Pryce-Jones (2008). Betrayal: France, the Arabs, and the Jews. New York: Encounter books. ISBN 978-1-594032-20-2. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
- Theodore Dalrymple (2011). The New Vichy Syndrome. Why European Intellectuals Surrender to Barbarism. New York: Encounter books. ISBN 978-1-59403-372-8. Retrieved June 8, 2012. The premises common to these theories are that a rapid demographic transition in Europe has been induced by “European politicians and civil servants”,[62] and will lead to a Muslim majority which will have an unchanging, hostile attitude toward their host nations.[11] Other premises, such as acquiring the compliance of or control over bureaucracies, intelligentsias and European political leaders are frequent.[63]
In his book Wars of Blood and Faith, conservative US military analyst Ralph Peters states that far from being about to take over Europe through demographic change, "Europe's Muslims are living on borrowed time" and that in the event of a major terrorist attack in Europe, thanks to the "ineradicable viciousness" of Europeans and what he perceives as a historical tendency to over-react to real or perceived threats, European Muslims "will be lucky if they're only deported."[64]
According to Marján and Sapir, the very idea of "Eurabia" is "based on an extremist conspiracy theory, according to which Europe and the Arab states would join forces to make life impossible for Israel and Islamize the old continent."[4]
Writing in Race & Class in 2006, author and freelance journalist Matt Carr argued that Eurabia had moved from "an outlandish conspiracy theory" to a "dangerous Islamophobic fantasy". Carr states,
Arun Kundnani, writing for the International Centre for Counter-terrorism, notes that "Eurabia" fulfills the Counterjihad-movement's "structural need" for a conspiracy theory, and compares "Eurabia" to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,[62] while Carr compares it to the Zionist Occupation Government claim.[65]
Post 9/11 significance[edit]
After the September 11 attacks Muslims and the Arab world emerged as a perceived threat.[35] Muslim minority populations and Muslim immigration gained new political significance. Scholar José Pedro Zúquete notes that
Eurabia had then re-entered into the vocabulary through Bat Ye'Or's work, most notably the book published in 2005, Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis,[3] although she first used the term in 2002.[9][66] Subsequently, the coining of the term has been attributed to her.[10]
2011 Norway attacks[edit]
2083: A European Declaration of Independence, the manifesto of Anders Behring Breivik, the perpetrator of the 2011 Norway attacks, includes a lengthy discussion of and support for the "Eurabia" theory. It also contains several articles on the Eurabia theme by Bat Ye'Or and Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen (Fjordman). [67] As a result, the theory received widespread mainstream media attention following the attacks.[68] In the verdict against Breivik, the court noted that "many people share Breivik's conspiracy theory, including the Eurabia theory. The court finds that very few people, however, share Breivik's idea that the alleged "Islamization" should be fought with terror."[69]
U.S. politics[edit]
In the United States, the theories have found strong proponents in the counterjihad movement, among them the president of Stop Islamization of America, Robert Spencer[70] and right-wing political commentators Daniel Pipes[71] and Mark Steyn.[72] In his 2011–2012 run for the Republican presidential nomination, senator Rick Santorum warned that Europe was "creating an opportunity for the creation of Eurabia", and that the continent was "losing, because they are not having children."[73]
Eurabia theories have also been espoused by less typical conservatives, for example, Bruce Bawer, an American expatriate who has lived in Europe since the 1990s, and supported Ye'Or's allegations that there was a deliberate, coordinated effort to create Eurabia. Bawer argued that many European politicians and policy makers, in efforts to gain approval of Muslim voters or to appeal to multiculturalism, were effectively allowing the creation of Muslim-only enclaves where basic human rights were ignored and events likehonor killings had become commonplace.[74][75][76]
No comments:
Post a Comment