Tuesday, 4 March 2014

తమాషా చేస్తున్నారా?..తోలు తీస్తాం

తమాషా చేస్తున్నారా?..తోలు తీస్తాం

Published at: 05-03-2014 06:23 AM
 1  0  0 
 
 

హైదరాబాద్ సిటీ, మార్చి 4: తెలంగాణ రాష్ట్రంలో సీఎం పదవితో పాటు 60 సీట్లను రాజకీయ పార్టీలు బీసీలకు ఇవ్వాలని బీసీ సంఘాలు డిమాండ్ చేశాయి. దీనిపై విధాన నిర్ణయాన్ని నాలుగురోజుల్లోగా తీసుకోవాలని తెలిపాయి. మంగళవారం 96 కుల సంఘాలు, 45 బీసీ సంఘాల కీలక భేటీ జూబ్లీ హాలులో బీసీ సంక్షేమ సంఘం అధ్యక్షుడు ఆర్.కృష్ణయ్య అధ్యక్షతన జరిగింది. ఉదయం నుంచి సాయంత్రం దాకా సంఘాల ప్రతినిధుల నుంచి అభిప్రాయాలు సేకరించిన కృష్ణయ్య.. ఆ తర్వాత వివరాలు ప్రకటించారు. దమ్మున్నవారంతా చట్టసభలకు దూరంగా ఉంటున్నారని, విజ్ఞానంలేని అగ్రకులాలకు చెందినవారు సీఎంలు అవుతున్నారని అన్నారు. టీడీపీ, టీఆర్ఎస్, బీజేపీ, కాంగ్రెస్ పార్టీలు నాలుగు రోజుల్లో బీసీ డిక్లరేషన్ ప్రకటించాలని, తెలంగాణలో సీఎం పదవితో పాటు 60 సీట్లు, ఆంధ్రప్రదేశ్‌లో 90 సీట్లు ఇచ్చే పార్టీకే మద్దతుఇస్తామని స్పష్టం చేశారు. దొరల రాజ్యానికి గోరీ కడతామని, తమాషా చేస్తే తోలు తీస్తామని హెచ్చరిం చారు. బీసీల్లో రాజకీయ చైతన్యం గుర్తించాకే.. తెలంగాణలో బీసీలకే సీఎం పదవి ఇస్తామని టీడీపీ ప్రకటి ంచిందని తెలిపా రు. జనాభా ప్రాతిపదికన బీసీలకు వాటా అందాలని, జనాభాలో 15 శాతంగా ఉన్న అగ్రకులాలు 66 ఏళ్లు పరిపాలించా యని, బీసీలు ఇంకెన్నాళ్లు అధికారానికి దూరంగా ఉంటారని, ఇక సహించేది లేదని ఆయన అన్నారు. టీడీపీలాగే కాంగ్రెస్, టీఆర్ఎస్, వైసీపీ, బీజేపీ కూడా సీఎం పదవిని బీసీలకు ఇస్తామని ప్రకటించాలని కోరారు. చట్టసభల్లో బీసీ రిజర్వేషన్లు పెట్టాలని, రూ.25 వేల కోట్లతో బీసీలకు రాష్ట్రస్థాయిలో, రూ.50 వేల కోట్లతో జాతీయ స్థాయిలో సబ్‌ప్లాన్ ఏర్పాటు చేయాలన్నారు. కేంద్ర ఉద్యోగాల్లో బీసీల సంఖ్య పెరగాలని, దీనికోసం పోరాడాతామని తెలిపారు. రెండు రాష్ట్రాలు కూడా సామాజిక తెలంగాణ, సామాజిక ఆంధ్ర కావాలని ఆయన ఆశాభావం వ్యక్తం చేశారు. ఈ సమావేశంలో శ్రీనివాస్‌గౌడ్ (బీసీ యువజన సంఘం), గుజ్జకృష్ణ(బీసీ ప్రజా సమితి), ర్యాగ రమేష్(బీసీ విద్యార్థి సంఘం), పెరిక సురేష్(బీసీ మేధావులు), యెగ్గే మల్లేశం(కురుమ సంఘం), వేముల వెంకటేష్(వడ్డెరసంఘం), జి.మల్లేష్‌యాదవ్ (బీసీ ఫ్రంట్), జాజులకృష్ణ తదితర బీసీ సంఘాల ప్రతినిధులు పాల్గొన్నారు.
- See more at: http://www.andhrajyothy.com/node/72110#sthash.kj2nkdmC.dpuf

Monday, 3 March 2014

86వ ఆస్కార్ అవార్డుల పండుగ

అట్టహాసంగా 86వ ఆస్కార్ అవార్డుల పండుగ

Published at: 03-03-2014 12:39 PM
 1  0  1 
 
 

లాస్ఏంజిలెస్, మార్చి 3 : హాలీవుడ్‌లో ఆదివారం అర్థరాత్రి అట్టహాసంగా జరిగిన 86వ ఆస్కర్ వేడుకలలో "12 ఇయర్స్ ఎస్లేవ్'' చిత్రం ఉత్తమ చిత్రంగా ఎంపికైంది. గ్రావిటీ, డల్లాస్ బయ్యర్స్ క్లబ్, హర్ వంటి చిత్రాల నుంచి గట్టి పోటీని ఎదుర్కొని ఈ చిత్రం విజేతగా నిలిచింది. ఈ సంవత్సరం ఉత్తమ సహాయనటుడికి పురస్కార ప్రదానంతో కార్యక్రమం మొదలైంది. 'డల్లాస్ బయ్యర్స్ క్లబ్' చిత్రంలో నటనకు గానూ జారెడ్ లెటో ఈ అవార్డును గెలుచుకున్నారు. ఆస్కార్ ఆవార్డు రేసుల్లో 'గ్రావిటీ' చిత్రం ముందుకు దూసుకెళ్లింది. ఈ చిత్రానికి మొత్తం ఏడు అవార్డులు వరించాయి. అయితే ఉత్తమ చిత్రం అవార్డును '12 ఇయర్స్ ఎస్లేవ్' చిత్రం దక్కించుకుంది. ఉత్తమ నటుడుగా మాథ్యూ మెక్ కొనాప్‌జే, ఉత్తమ నటిగా కేట్ బ్లాంషె అవార్డులు దక్కించుకున్నారు.
* ఉత్తమ చిత్రం - 12 ఇయర్స్ ఎస్లేవ్
* ఉత్తమ నటుడు - మాథ్యూ మెక్ కొనాప్‌జే(డల్లాస్ బయ్యర్స్ క్లబ్)
* ఉత్తమ నటి - కేట్ బ్లాంషె (బ్లూ జాస్మిన్)
* ఉత్తమ దర్శకుడు - ఆల్ఫాన్సో కారియెన్ (గ్రావిటీ)
* ఉత్తమ సహాయ నటుడు - జారెడ్ లెటో (డల్లాస్ బయ్యర్స్ క్లబ్)
* ఉత్తమ సహాయ నటి - లుపితా న్యాంగో (12 ఇయర్స్ ఎ స్లేవ్)
* ఉత్తమ కాస్టూమ్స్ డిజైనర్ చిత్రం - దిగ్రేట్ గాట్స్ బీ
* ఉత్తమ విదేశీ చిత్రం - ది గ్రేట్ బ్యూటీ (ఇటాలియన్)
* ఉత్తమ యానిమేటెడ్ షార్ట్ ఫిల్మ్ - మిస్టర్ హూబ్లాట్
* ఉత్తమ యానిమేట్ ప్యూచర్ ఫిల్మ్ - ఫ్రోజెన్
* ఉత్తమ డాక్యుమెంటరీ చిత్రం - 20 ఫీట్ ఫ్రమ్ స్టార్ డమ్
* ఉత్తమ డాక్యుమెంటరీ లఘు చిత్రం - ద లేడీ ఇన్ నెంబర్ 6
* ఉత్తమ లైవ్ యాక్షన్ షార్ట్ ఫిల్మ్ - హీలియం
* ఉత్తమ మేకప్ అండ్ హెయిర్ స్టైల్ చిత్రం - డల్లాస్ బయ్యర్స్ క్లబ్
* సాంకేతిక విభాగంలో గ్రావిటి చిత్రానికి 5 అవార్డులు. ఉత్తమ విజువల్ ఎఫెక్ట్స్, ఫిల్మ్ ఎడిటింగ్, సినిమాటోగ్రఫీ, సౌండ్‌మిక్సింగ్, సౌండ్ ఎడిటింగ్ విభాగాల్లో 'గ్రావిటీ' చిత్రం ఆస్కార్ అవార్డులను సొంతం చేసుకుంది.
- See more at: http://www.andhrajyothy.com/node/71610#sthash.LaNo819i.dpuf

SC refuses to ban ‘hate speeches’

Last Updated: Monday, March 03, 2014, 21:05

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a PIL seeking its direction to restrain politicians from indulging in "provocative and hate speeches", saying that it cannot curtail people's fundamental right to free speech.

"We cannot curtail fundamental rights of people. It is a precious rights guaranteed by Constitution," a bench headed by Justice RM Lodha said, adding "we are a mature democracy and it is for the public to decide."

The court said that it is a matter of perception and a statement objectionable to a person might not be normal to other person.

"We are 128 million people and there would be 128 million views. One is free not accept the view of others," the bench said.

The petitioner, advocate ML Sharma, contended that various politicians indulge in hate speech for securing political mileage in their favour and they must be restrained from doing so. 

నేతల విద్వేష ప్రసంగాలను అడ్డుకోలేం:సుప్రీం

Published at: 04-03-2014 06:03 AM

 New  0  0 

 




న్యూఢిల్లీ : రాజకీయనాయకులు విద్వేష ప్రసంగాలు చేయకుండా అడ్డుకోవడానికి కలుగజేసుకోలేమని సుప్రీంకోర్టు సోమవారం స్పష్టం చేసింది. విద్వేషపూరిత ప్రసంగాలు, అసాధ్యమైన హామీలతో ఓటర్లను ప్రభావితం చేయకుండా రాజకీయనాయకులను అడ్డుకునేలా ఎన్నికల సంఘాన్ని ఆదేశించాలని కోరుతూ దాఖలైన ప్రజాప్రయోజన వ్యాజ్యంపై సుప్రీం పైవిధంగా స్పందించింది. అలా ఆదేశిస్తే వాక్ స్వాతంత్య్రానికి విఘాతం కలిగే అవకాశముందని పేర్కొంది. 'అన్ని రకాల అభిప్రాయాలు ప్రజల ముందుకు రానివ్వండి. వారినే నిర్ణయించుకోనివ్వండి' అని వ్యాఖ్యానించింది.
రిజర్వేషన్లు విధానంపై పిల్ కొట్టివేత
కులం, మతం ఆధారంగా రిజర్వేషన్ల అమలును నిలిపేయాలని, ఆర్థిక పరిస్థితుల ఆధారంగానే వాటిని అమలు చేసేలా ప్రభుత్వాన్ని ఆదేశించాలని దాఖలైన ప్రజా ప్రయోజన వ్యాజ్యాన్ని సుప్రీంకోర్టు సోమవారం తోసిపుచ్చింది. ఈ విధానంలో తాము నేరుగా జోక్యం చేసుకోలేమని చీఫ్ జస్టిస్ పి. సదాశివం, జస్టిస్ రంజన్ గొగోయ్‌లతో కూడిన ధర్మాసనం పేర్కొంది.
- See more at: http://www.andhrajyothy.com/node/71698#sthash.wMnur2bx.dpuf


Hate Speech Cases
By Tom Head
Ads: Criminal Court Cases New iPAD Cases Asbestos Cases Industrial Cases Personal Injury Cases
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued six major landmark rulings on hate speech law since 1949.

Terminiello v. Chicago (1949)
Fr. Arthur Terminiello did for the Archdiocese of Chicago what mononucleosis did for kissing booths. A raging antisemite and right-wing lunatic, he gave a speech in Chicago that prompted protestors outdoors to riot. The city of Chicago arrested him under a law banning riotous speech, but the Supreme Court overturned his conviction.

[F]reedom of speech...," Justice William O. Douglas wrote for the 5-4 majority, is "protected against censorship or punishment, unless shown likely to roduce a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest ... There is no room under our Constitution for a more restrictive view."

Ads
Present Your Case - Free
www.presentyourcase.com
Talk to Lawyers in Your Area Today Fast, Free & Confidential Service
Public Arrest Records
instantcheckmate.com
1) Enter a Name & Search for Free. 2) View Background Check Instantly.
Personal Injury Cases
www.totalinjury.com
How Much Is Your Personal Injury Case Worth? Free Case Evaluation.
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
No organization has been more aggressively or justifiably pursued on grounds of hate speech than the Ku Klux Klan. But the arrest of an Ohio Klansman named Clarence Brandenburg on criminal syndicalism charges, based on a KKK speech that recommended overthrowing the government, was overturned in a ruling that has protected radicals of all political persuasions ever since. Writing for the unanimous Court, Justice William Brennan argued that "the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."

National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977)
When the National Socialist Party of America was declined a permit to speak in Chicago, the organizers turned to the small, ethnically Jewish town of Skokie—where 1/6th of the Jewish population was made up of families that had survived the Holocaust. County authorities attempted to block the Nazi march, but their efforts were overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in a terse ruling. After the ruling, the city of Chicago granted the Nazis three permits to march; the Nazis, in turn, decided to cancel their plans to march in Skokie.

R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)
After a teenager burned a makeshift cross on the lawn of an African-American couple, the St. Paul Bias Motivated Crime Ordinance—which prohibited symbols that "[arouse] anger, alarm or resentment in others on the basis of race, color, creed, religion or gender"—came into effect. In a unanimous ruling written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court held that the ordinance was excessively broad.

Virginia v. Black (2003)
11 years after the St. Paul case, the U.S. Supreme Court revisited the issue of cross-burning after three people were arrested separately for violating a Virginia ban. In a 5-4 ruling written by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Supreme Court held that while cross-burning may constitute illegal intimidation in some cases, a ban on the public burning of crosses would violate the First Amendment. "[A] State may choose to prohibit only those forms of intimidation," Justice O'Connor wrote, "that are most likely to inspire fear of bodily harm."

Snyder v. Phelps (2011)
Westboro Baptist Church has made a career out of being reprehensible. The organization, which came to national prominence by gleefully picketing the funeral of Matthew Shepard, later moved on to celebrating the 9/11 attacks and picketing military funerals. The family of Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, killed in Iraq in 2006, sued Westboro—and its leader, Fred Phelps—for intentional infliction of emotional distress.


In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Westboro's right to picket. While acknowledging that Westboro's "contribution to public discourse may be negligible," Chief Justice John Roberts's ruling rested in existing U.S. hate speech precedent: "Simply put, the church members had the right to be where they were."



Rayalaseema History

Formation of Rayalaseema districts And adoption of the name "Rayalaseema"

Under the subsidiary alliance system,concluded between the Nizam of Hyderabad and the East India Company on 24th october 1800,the Nizam ceded to the company the area corresponding to the modern districts of Bellary,Kadapa and Anantapur and parts of Kurnool and Chittoor districts.The Company government names this area the "Ceded districts" and constituted it as an administrative unit of the Madras Presidency in 1800 with Thomas Munro as principal collector to discharge both the military and civil duties.He restored Law and order after subduing the revolting local Palegars(rulers of villagers or group of villages) with a heavy hand, conducted the survey of land and introduced ryotwari system in the region.He carried the administration of the districts  with headquarters at Anantapur with the assistance of the Sub-collectors stationed at Adoni,Haranahalli,Kadapa and Cumbum(kambam).The ceded districts were divided in 1807 into two collectorates with headquarters, one at Bellary and the other at Kadapa.The area consisting of Adoni,Yemmiganuru and Aluru of the present Kurnool district and all the Taluks/mandals present Bellary and Anantapur districts, except Kadiri, formed Bellary district and the rest of the area carved into Kadapa district.

Kurnool district was formed in 1858 as a result of certain political developments following the conclusion of the subsidiary alliance.Part of the district consisting of the mandals of Kurnool, Patthikonda,Dhone(Dronachalam),Nandikotkur and Nandyal was a Jagir, ruled by the Nawabs of Kurnool under the Suzerainty of the Nizam of Hyderabad.When the Nizam ceded the region to the company,the Nawab,Aluf Khan,agreed to pay a voulntary peishcush of rupees one lakh to the Company government.Ghulam Rasul Khan,who became the Nawab in 1823,resorted to harsh measures to collect maximum revenue.He resumed  serveral inams and re-imposed certain taxes,which had been abolished during his predecessor's rule and started collecting large quantities of military stores and cannon, obviously for self-defence in times of need. The Company government suspected that the Nawab was stockpiling the arms in order to mount a revolt against it.So, a Commission was appointed to enquire into the matter.A body of troops was deployed from Bellary with the twin objects of rendering the assistance to the Commission when needed and overawe the Nawab. The Commission charged the Nawab with harbouring designs against the Company government. The Nawab was captured on this charge, and sent to Tiruchirapalli as prisoner in 1839. The jagir was annexed to the Company's territories  and was placed under the charge of a Commissioner. The area, so taken, was formed into a new district in1858,with headquarters at Kurnool, with the addition of the taluks of Koilkuntla,Kambam and Dupadu , which were taken from Kadapa district. Anantapur and Chittoor districts were formed for the administrative convenience in 1882 and 1911 respectively.The taluks of Anantapur,Dharmavaram, Penugonda,Madakasira,Hindupur,Gooty(Gutthi) and Tadipatri were separated from  Bellary district and carved into a new district with headquarters at Anantaur.Kadiri Taluk was added to the new district by transferring it from Kadapa district in1910.The taluk Rayadurgam was transferred from Bellary to Anantapur in1953.

Bringing together Madanapalle,vayalpadu and Pileru taluks of Kadapa district, and Chittoor,Chandragiri,Nagiri ,Puttur and Palamaneru taluks of North Arcot district formed Chittoor district. Kuppam Taluk, which had been a part of Mysore state,was added to the district  in1928. The erstwhile Zamindari areas of Punganuru,Karvetinagar and Kalahasthi,Which has been under the supervision of the Collectors of Kadapa and North Arcot districts earlier , were brought under the supervision of the Chittoor collectorate after its formation.They were added to the district on abolition of Zamindari system after India attained independence.

Adoption of the Name "Rayalaseema":

Historically, the name such as Maharajaranadu or Maharajanadu,Marjavadinadu and Renadu were in vogue for the region. In the last 16th Century, "Rayalavariseema" and "Rayalaseema" were used to refer to a part of the present Rayalaseema. For the reasons not clear, this name went out of use, and term "Ceded districts(దత్త మండలాలు)" given by the British rulers in AD1800 continued to be in vogue for the region till 1928. As the nationalist spirit was growing in the country, this term came to be disliked by the enlightened Andhra leaders.At one of the Andhra conferences held at Nandyal in 1928, Pappuri Ramacharyulu proposed, at the instance of Chilukuri Narayana Rao, the revival of the earlier name "Rayalaseema" for the region for the memory of the famous Rayas of Vijayanagara, who ruled it as a part of their empire for well over three centuries, from mid-fourteenth century to the mid-seventeenth century. The proposal  was unanimously carried and the name popularised and got entered in the offical records.

(All the above sentences in this post are taken directly from the book named "Rayalaseema During Colonial Times" by Yenadi Raju.The publication of the book has been financially supported by the Indian council of Historical Research and published by Northern Book Centre,422/1 Daryanganj,Ansari Road,New Delhi-11002. All the copy-rights of the above published sentences in this post belongs to the writer, council and publisher.)

Sunday, 2 March 2014

Donakonda emerging as frontrunner

Donakonda emerging as frontrunner

M.L.MELLY MAITREYI
SHARE  ·   PRINT   ·   T+  
Despite the growing clamour to locate the new capital city for the residual Andhra Pradesh between Vijayawada and Guntur or in Kurnool which was the capital of Andhra State before merger, a nondescript area, Donakonda in Prakasam may emerge as a strong contender.
Availability of abundant Government land -- a whopping 54,000 acres which cuts the acquisition cost to minimum, central to all districts of Seemandhra region, an aerodrome that can be made operational immediately and Darsi branch canal which can carry Krishna water to Donakonda and Guntur-Bangaluru railway line are what seem to be weighing in its favour for developing a green field capital city.
A new capital city may have a maximum population of one lakh in the first phase including employees of Secretariat, Head of Departments, staff associated with the legislature, Ministers and their families and floating population of about 40,000. To begin with 5,000 acres of unencumbered government land should be sufficient with a buffer government land of another 15,000 acres.
An informal study commissioned by some individuals on various possible locations mentioned that metro cities like Chennai, Mumbai and Kolkata were all but small villages when they were identified by the then British Government to be developed as capitals of the Presidency areas as they were close to ports. The villages were developed into towns and over two centuries transformed into major metros. “A new green field Capital City should lend itself for gradual growth with abundant Government land all around, apart from being easily accessible to all the districts of Coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema. Thus Donakonda becomes a preferable location compared to other places in Krishna, Guntur, North Coastal Andhra, uplands of Nellore or Rayalaseema,” sources said.
An opinion is gaining ground in many quarters that developing a city on the lines of Hyderabad should be shunned as it rendered all other cities inconsequential. Precisely for this reason Macharla in Guntur, closer to Hyderabad, would not be a wise choice, they said.
Across the World too, it is not always the most populated and congested city that is the capital of the country or of the State. For instance, the headquarters of New York State is in Albunny, a small city and for California, the headquarters is not San Fransisco but Sacramento. Canberra, the capital of Australia is just an administrative city and capital while its financial and industrial headquarters are Sydney and Melbourne, those in favour of Donakonda reel out.
An opinion is gaining ground in that developing a city on the lines of Hyderabad should be shunned as it rendered all other cities inconsequential

Wanchoo Committee report

This is for all those Seema champions who shout at the top of their voices that injustice being meted out to them, if Kurnool is not capital. What a Joke...

Vijayawada: The Wanchoo Committee report might become significant once again in the selection of a new capital for residuary Andhra Pradesh. The Committee had submitted its report on establishing of the capital when a dispute arose between Rayalaseema and Coastal Andhra in 1953, when Andhra had separated from the Madras state. Following this dispute, the Union government had appointed Justice Kailashnath Wanchoo, the then Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court, in a bid to find solutions to the various issues that arose during bifurcation of Andhra from Madras.

Significantly, the then Union government, led by Jawaharlal Nehru, entrusted the Committee with finalising a suitable location for establishing the new capital. This was necessitated following a dispute between Rayalaseema and Coastal Andhra after Nehru’s announcement regarding the formation of the new state in Parliament on December 19, 1952. Following this, the four member committee headed by Justice Wanchoo toured Andhra state, from Ichapuram to Anantapur. Taking all aspects into consideration, the panel finally selected the area between Vijayawada and Guntur as the most suitable place for setting up the new capital and submitted its report to the Union government in February, 1953. However, the people of Rayalaseema refused to merge with Coastal Andhra and instead preferred to continue with Madras state. Their main objection was that Coastal Andhra was comparatively more developed than Rayalaseema.
After intense dialogue, the legislators from Rayalaseema put forth some conditions for the merger with Coastal Andhra. The conditions were that the new capital would be in Rayalaseema, the region would get a university, and enough water.

In this backdrop, legislators voted to pick the new capital, the choices being Kurnool and Vijayawada. Kurnool got 80 votes while 79 legislators favoured Vijayawada. Vijayawada lost by a single vote, primarily due to the fact that five legislators from the combined Madras state cast their votes despite instructions from the then chief minister C. Rajagopalachari not to participate in the voting. Significantly, seven legislators from Guntur area, led by Prakasam Pantulu and N.G. Ranga, supported Kurnool as capital, obeying the directions of Nehru. Nehru and the Congress leadership were wary that if Vijayawada was selected as the capital, it could turn into a hub for Communist parties. Thereon, politics took centrestage, with Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy playing a significant role in selecting the capital and the subsequent merger with Hyderabad state. With life coming full circle, the Wanchoo Committee report has again assumed significance among intellectuals and political circles.